M. Houkes
Ganar
J. Cizek
Ganar
Corentin Denolly vs Max Houkes Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W L L
Form
W W W W W W W L W LCara A Cara: Denolly 1 - 1 Houkes
Ellas han jugado 4 conjuntos en total, con Denolly victoriosa 2 y Houkes victoriosa 2. El último partido entre Denolly y Houkes fue en el M25 Kigali, el 05-10-2024, Cuartos de Semifinals, Clay, con Corentin Denolly obteniendo la victoria 7-6(6) 3-2 ret.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Corentin Denolly | 1 |
| Max Houkes | 1 |
M25 Kigali(05-10-2024)
7
6
3
2
Próxima partido
27 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
IMPARES
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 3-2 ret. |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Max Houkes
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Corentin Denolly
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 2 |
| 15 | Juegos Ganados | 20 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 4 | Faltas dobles totales | 9 |
| 1:25:55 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:25:55 |
| 70% (74/105) | % De Primer Servicio | 68% (82/121) |
| 61% (45/74) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 68% (56/82) |
| 42% (13/31) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 33% (13/39) |
| 45% (5/11) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 80% (8/10) |
| 43% (52/121) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 45% (47/105) |
| 50% (1/2) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Corentin Denolly
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Max Houkes
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Max Houkes
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Jelle Sels
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Max Houkes
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Dominic Stricker
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Laurent Lokoli
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Dominic Stricker
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Guy Den Ouden
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Nicolas Parizzia
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Francesco Ferrari
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (412/245) | Win/Loss | 66% (268/139) |
| 60% (900/599) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (588/339) |
| 54% (7528/6445) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (4879/3810) |
| 56% (61/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) |
| 66% (293/150) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (254/121) |
| 55% (58/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1998 | Aces Total | 752 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1887 | Total Double Faults | 1486 |
| 1:26:44 | Average Match Time | 1:28:28 |
| 499.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 403.72 |
| 65% (26404/40626) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13513/22306) |
| 67% (17798/26404) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9122/13513) |
| 49% (6925/14223) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4126/8793) |
| 45% (2081/4615) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1276/2637) |
| 43% (17578/41276) | Return Points Win % | 45% (9984/22411) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (52/66) | Challenger W/L | 52% (42/39) |
| 67% (355/175) | Futures W/L | 70% (226/98) |
| 63% (409/648) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (264/401) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (101/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (49/98) |
| 59% (114/192) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (62/118) |
| 90% (397/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (266/236) |
| 10% (397/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (266/29) |
| 21% (260/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (140/30) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
